Samsung's Galaxy Note 7 apology is appreciated, but transparency and details about what went wrong will go farther for the brand.
2016-11-09 08:37:49
alice
11
That transparency will do more to repair Samsung's brand hit than any apology will. Here's what questions I'd like answered:
How did the handoff between the players in the supply chain lead to the Galaxy Note 7 battery issue?
What processes will be changed?
How does Samsung's post mortem apply to the smartphone industry overall?
The actual cause of the battery issue and the role of hardware and software integration?
Where did Samsung controls and management decision making fall short and what's being done to fix those process shortfalls?
Add it up and the investigation into the device and its parts are important. The processes and learning for the rest of the industry will be just as important.
-
Compounder Adell Plastics shifts work to other plants following Baltimore fire[2016/10/10]
-
Tesla doubles power in commercial Powerpack battery[2016/10/31]
-
Customers like electric vehicle more[2016/09/22]
-
Apple is working on iPhone batteries that last longer and don’t explode[2016/10/08]
-
How safe are portable battery packs?[2016/10/21]
-
Warming to lithium-ion, Toyota charges up its battery options[2016/10/31]
-
How can a battery catch fire?[2016/10/15]
-
Apple's iPhone 7 Lands in Last Place in Battery Life Test[2016/10/04]
-
Mopie Powerstation Review: A Smartphone's Secret To All-Day Battery Life[2016/09/26]
-
A window into battery life for next-gen lithium cells[2016/10/19]
-
How Scientists Turned Junkyard Scrap Metal Into A Battery[2016/11/08]
-
Battery power unviable alternative to traditional energy sources[2016/10/25]
-
Battery power unviable alternative to traditional energy sources[2016/10/25]