Samsung's Galaxy Note 7 apology is appreciated, but transparency and details about what went wrong will go farther for the brand.
2016-11-09 08:37:49
alice
11
That transparency will do more to repair Samsung's brand hit than any apology will. Here's what questions I'd like answered:
How did the handoff between the players in the supply chain lead to the Galaxy Note 7 battery issue?
What processes will be changed?
How does Samsung's post mortem apply to the smartphone industry overall?
The actual cause of the battery issue and the role of hardware and software integration?
Where did Samsung controls and management decision making fall short and what's being done to fix those process shortfalls?
Add it up and the investigation into the device and its parts are important. The processes and learning for the rest of the industry will be just as important.
-
2016years Reach Test Report[2016/09/11]
-
The idea of a national ripple effect didn’t seem to much concern Phil Rozenski, policy chair of the American Progressive Bag Alliance.[2016/11/14]
-
How safe are portable battery packs?[2016/10/21]
-
Global Reinforced Plastics Industry[2016/09/27]
-
Warming to lithium-ion, Toyota charges up its battery options[2016/10/31]
-
?Samsung apologizes to Galaxy Note 7 customers[2016/11/09]
-
Bendable Battery May Power Future Wearable Devices, Smartphones[2016/10/19]
-
Apple is working on iPhone batteries that last longer and don’t explode[2016/10/08]
-
Video Microscopy Technique Reveals How Battery-Killing Dendrites Grow[2016/10/21]
-
THE BATTERY TECHNOLOGY THAT COULD PUT AN END TO BATTERY FIRES[2016/10/25]
-
AM Alert: Plastic bags’ environmental impact debated[2016/10/18]
-
Battery power unviable alternative to traditional energy sources[2016/10/25]